{"id":17699,"date":"2016-01-28T08:25:08","date_gmt":"2016-01-28T06:25:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.times.mw\/?p=17699"},"modified":"2016-01-28T08:25:08","modified_gmt":"2016-01-28T06:25:08","slug":"open-perspective-progressives-besieged-by-slowmageddon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/2016\/01\/28\/open-perspective-progressives-besieged-by-slowmageddon\/","title":{"rendered":"Open Perspective: Progressives besieged by Slowmageddon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019S amazing how so right classical thinkers have been about politics and politicians. Indeed the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint.<\/p>\n<p>I am convinced that politicians &#8211; by this I mean men in government &#8211; whatever their hue cannot by their own character be trusted. Nor do they by their own character want to be trusted well-knowing what builds trust.<\/p>\n<p>Why mistrust leaders? It\u2019s because too many of them make too many ruinous mistakes.<\/p>\n<p>Politicians make more promises than they have the moral courage to keep. If anything, politicians<br \/>\nsucceed only in antagonising good citizens and then go on to threaten them.<\/p>\n<p>I am persuaded by Ronald Reagan\u2019s outrageous candour that government is not always the solution to<br \/>\nproblems government is the problem; that a patriot has the duty to protect his people from their own<br \/>\ngovernment.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, people have little choice but to deal with government, sometimes ruthlessly. It seems this is the<br \/>\nonly way to ensure that whoever constitutes government delivers to satisfaction. Else forget it.<\/p>\n<p>Harsh rebellious thinking, but illustratable from the shortfalls in the present state of public<br \/>\naffairs: For a start our leaders must behave &#8211; for they are not &#8211; in ways that show that the economy<br \/>\nis now in reverse. Malawians are becoming poorer, hungrier and angrier. Hard decisions had better be<br \/>\nmade to avert the chaos that accompanies collapsed economies.<\/p>\n<p>Malawians demand serious public sector reforms, not least public finance management. This country must<br \/>\nbuild a moral, systemically efficient and trustworthy public sector.<\/p>\n<p>In all honesty, reforms commenced well. Millions were pleased, and many said so. But the emerging<br \/>\nreality is being undetermined by Slowmageddon. Action in principle areas such as finance is criminally<br \/>\nslow and the results shoddy and inadequate.<\/p>\n<p>Our best is not good enough. And my take is that oversight by high offices has been inadequate, giving<br \/>\nanti-reformists opportunities to retard operations.<\/p>\n<p>Leaders have unwittingly invested their trust in otherwise un-trustable people effectively allowing<br \/>\nheartless detractors to create a \u2018much ado about nothing\u2019 facade where indeed nothing significant<br \/>\ntakes place.<\/p>\n<p>A lot has been said about firing, retiring or re-deploying detractors but there are no signs that the<br \/>\nneedful will be done. Budgetary constraints to pay off detractors I presume!<\/p>\n<p>Reforms relating to finance are gripped by Slowmageddon. And this despite the urgency and the risk of<br \/>\ndamaging prospects for resumption of budget support already postponed by a further 24 months.<\/p>\n<p>Not that budget support matters.<\/p>\n<p>Not in my case. I irreversibly believe it is high time Malawi broke this oppressive yoke called aid.<br \/>\nThe significant issue is that without secure systems capital flight, resource bleeding and unholy cash<br \/>\nbonanzas will persist.<\/p>\n<p>Government counter-position regarding quality of financial reforms is awfully weak; almost<br \/>\nembarrassing.<\/p>\n<p>Clear suggestions to use private sector and international experts remain unconsidered. Matters of<br \/>\nsovereignty I presume.<\/p>\n<p>To me it\u2019s illogical to believe that Malawians will change systems that form a life line for<br \/>\nthousands. Honestly one cannot close a water tap before one\u2019s thirsty is quenched. Malawians can be<br \/>\nquite wicked.<\/p>\n<p>No concrete decisions are made about where, how and who to roll out a pragmatic irrigation policy.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile the green belt initiative remains an underfunded experiment five years on.<\/p>\n<p>When citizens legitimately seek action, what you hear instead of action is convoluted technical detail<br \/>\nexcusing failure. You hear serious contradictions and discordance in policy application.<\/p>\n<p>Always on the back foot!<\/p>\n<p>These are manifestations of indecision, failure of decisions and inability to act. This I understand<br \/>\nperfectly because decisions need conscious hard work and presence of mind. Yes, decision and action<br \/>\nare no universal talents.<\/p>\n<p>On this Napoleon observes that nothing is more difficult and therefore precious than to be able to<br \/>\ndecide. The most difficult decision among leaders is the decision to act. It takes little to do things<br \/>\nand great strength to decide what to do so.<\/p>\n<p>Inability to make decisions is one major reason leaders fail, says John Maxwell, but then the essence<br \/>\nof presidency is decision-making.<\/p>\n<p>In the words of Anna Lindh governments decide policy and requisite conditions for growth and<br \/>\ndevelopment.<\/p>\n<p>The wise further do advise that in times of despondency, such as Malawi is passing through, a<br \/>\npresident calms the people with sober decision making and not make them feel neglected and stupefied.<\/p>\n<p>Sure leaders must be patient but within limits because excessive patience retards speed of decision<br \/>\nmaking. Logically desperate situations demand desperate decisions as much as exceptional challenges<br \/>\nrequire exceptional responses. Tough problems are basically decisions waiting to be made without which<br \/>\nproblems persist.<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, says Carly Fiorina leaders hardly consider &#8211; and I dare add understand &#8211; how indecision<br \/>\nimpacts policy and development. If processes are slow, flawed or dysfunctional so will the decisions<br \/>\nemerging from that process.<\/p>\n<p>A lot has been said of policies emerging from partisanship that when challenged the policies lead to<br \/>\ninaction, excuses and paralysis of decision making process. Of course most indecision results from<br \/>\nuncritical analysis and inadequate data.<\/p>\n<p>In Peter Drucker\u2019s thinking leaders fail to recognise that decisions are a multi-level process not<br \/>\nreserved for executives. He declares it wrong to assume that only senior executives make decisions or<br \/>\nthat their decisions necessarily matter the most. And I agree unreservedly.<\/p>\n<p>This is a dangerous idea. Which is why leaving out citizen\u2019s ideas or embarrassing them into silence<br \/>\nis serious retrogression. Citizens require attention and respect not denunciation.<\/p>\n<p>Carlos Ghosn advises leaders to listen to people with both negative and positive opinions, to blend<br \/>\nall opinions before a decision is made. I agree with Ghosn, but I believe that opinions are neither<br \/>\nnegative nor positive; they are only different.<\/p>\n<p>Absolutely, opinions are only different each as priceless as the other.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that difference supports the inevitability of change and dismantles the enslaving boredom of<br \/>\nconstancy and permanence which politicians exploit to full advantage.<\/p>\n<p>Well, if you have to know, I hate permanence and indecision that creates false reality. I seek the<br \/>\nfreedom of the wind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019S amazing how so right classical thinkers have been about politics and politicians. Indeed the passions of men will not conform to the dictates of reason and justice without constraint. I am convinced that politicians &#8211; by this I mean men in government &#8211; whatever their hue cannot by their own character be trusted. Nor [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":15427,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17699"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17699\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17702,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17699\/revisions\/17702"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/15427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.times.mw\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}